this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48715 readers
2170 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Commerce Department has decided to hike anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood to 20.56 per cent, with B.C. lumber organizations calling them unjustified, punitive and protectionist.

The hiked softwood lumber duties come amid the growing trade war between Canada and the U.S., and represent the latest blow to B.C.'s beleaguered forestry industry.

B.C. Forests Minister Ravi Parmar described the long-awaited rate hike as a "gut punch" for B.C.'s forestry industry which has seen thousands of workers laid off over the last few years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So .... I live in the province that's most impacted by this (BC), but not in a logging area. I gotta admit I'm not really sure how to think about this particular tariff area, despite all the media scare mongering over the years.

Like we hear about mills closing, and logs getting shipped 400km from small communities with closed mills, to get turned into pulp at big mills, generally for export to other countries. And those closures have been ongoing for like decades now, with a seemingly shrinking market presence north of the border despite our governments feigned attempts to take action, and all the free trade stuff that's been in play. K.

We also hear about the high cost of construction, and have a serious housing problem -- with the government saying they're gonna try addressing that issue more in the next 5 or so years.

We'll need lumber to make those houses. We can use lumber to make furniture for those houses. Hell, we can use lumber to make things like the towels/dishcloths that go into those houses. We use lumber for our ass paper in those houses. If the US doesn't want to buy it as a result of them tariffing it to shit, why not sell it cheap to local manufacturers to supply local demand with local product?

One thing I've often heard, is that BC exports raw stuff down south, and then we end up buying back processed goods, which seems kinda wrong to me. If those manufacturing facilities are generally south of the border currently..... it can't be that difficult to get em setup up here. I mean, shit, with all those closed mills.... repurpose them, and repurpose the people who were in that industry, to be slightly further down that supply chain.... no?

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why not sell it cheap?

Because that’s not capitalism. They’d rather set it on fire than sell it for less than that want it to be worth.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

So do something similar in structure to the Dairy industry.

Also, supply/demand curves are very much capitalism. When demand goes down, and supply is high, price point goes down to maximize profit. If you want to maintain the price point when demand drops off, you limit supply -- not by burning things you've already got, but by pulling back on logging / cutting down old growth trees. So, still a win if they go that route, though not as beneficial to Canadians in terms of building stuff.