this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
174 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
4596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week, Marathon Fusion, a San Francisco-based energy startup, submitted a preprint detailing an action plan for synthesizing gold particles via nuclear transmutation—essentially the process of turning one element into another by tweaking its nucleus. The paper, which has yet to undergo peer review, argues that the proposed system would offer a new revenue stream from all the new gold being produced, in addition to other economic and technological benefits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why do we try to turn things into gold? The price of gold would collapse if we succeeded, so wouldn't it be completely pointless?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I dunno. I would be cool with it if we stopped mining for Gold with all the environmental problems and found a way to profitably clean up the mercury from past gold mining and places like Grassy Narrows with extensive mercury poisoning.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

I would assume that this would lead to a rise in mercury mining instead of cleaning up Mercury contaminations, because that would probably be cheaper. And I don't think mercury mining is any less toxic than gold mining.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be great. But what I'm talking about is the collapse of the price of gold.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Since fiat currencies are not connected to gold... no problem?

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Who gives a shit about the gold price except for some idiots who think it has some inherent value beyond some applications in electronics.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If you have a monopoly on the process, then its the same as the DeBeers Diamond Cartel. You can keep the price up by limiting the sale and spending a ton of money on marketing.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's wrong w/ collapsing the price of gold? Gold is super useful since it doesn't oxidize, so it's fantastic in electronics and space stuff. Making that cheaper would be awesome.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I want to sell my gold teeth 😐

[–] simsalabim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Besides the shift to mercury mining others have already listed, you really think that this process is cheaper than mining gold and also cleaner and safer at the same time?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

But what about alchemy?