375
After using ChatGPT, man swaps his salt for sodium bromide—and suffers psychosis (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lazysoci.al/post/31731511

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 109 points 1 year ago (16 children)

ChatGPT is allowed, but chocolate eggs with toys inside are supposed to be too dangerous? 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I am literally just making this up on the spot and have no evidence for it, but I'm starting to wonder if maybe the real reason for the kinder egg ban was anticompetitive lobbying by Hershey or something like that, and the toy thing was just the excuse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    The american law prohibiting objects in food predates the kinder eggs by decades. And it's because people use to put all kinds of shit in american food. The law that bans them into is the Food, Drug and Cosmetic act of 1938.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, people like to mock us about it, but I think it's a reasonable regulation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, people like to mock us about it, but I think it’s a reasonable regulation.

    It should apparently be amended, though. There is a known case that it accidentally forbids but should not forbid.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Then how did we have toys in cereal boxes and cracker jacks up until much more recently?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because it's not inside the food itself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It wasnt the "toy thing" theres a law about putting inedible choking hazards in food. The food drug and cosmetic act of 1938. It bans putting any toy or inedible object in candy unless it is a functional part of the food. So the capsule in the kinder egg isnt ok but the wooden stick in a popsicle, the stick of a lollypop or the ring of a ring pop is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    So, they could put a lollipop-shaped stick into a kinder-egg, to function as a handle? Then the toy could be inside the ball in the end of the handle, so that it wouldn't actually be inside the food, but a part of the handle, which would be a functional part of the food?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    GPT needs another LLM trained on only the stupid things people do and how to avoid doing horrible things to yourself and others to watch over each conversation and intervene.

    US versions of Kinder eggs are just a stupid shower thought that was taken too far

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent