you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I was sure you were wrong ant that $150 was just an incentive to be in the program. That battery owners would be paid for their power.

You were right, though. It really is a flat $150 per year. The company who manages the energy from the batteries gets paid for the energy, not the battery owner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    My Tesla Powerwall is part of a VPP program in the northeast. We have 3 powerwalls in total that typically put back 20 KWh during VPP events. Last year, the first year we did this, we were reimbursed $1459.97 at the end of the season. That energy returned to the grid also counts as a credit on our electric bill.

    Makes me glad I don’t live in CA.

    Edit: I guess it’s the sheer size of the VPP they tested in CA that’s the real news here. The one I’m part of currently shows 1463 homes involved in it.

  • source
  • parent