If a blind protester in a wheelchair is considered a terrorist, anyone can be treated as a terrorist
(www.councilestatemedia.uk)
What is non-factual or poorly framed about that?
Protestors didn't want to get arrested without achieving critical mass, so to prevent being arrested before that point, they only wrote their signs after doing so.
It sounds like you want the BBC to be a mouthpiece for your views and interpret anything less than that as propaganda. If I can listen to a BBC report about it and come away a) with renewed disgust at the ban and b) understanding the tactics used by the protestors, what have they done wrong?