this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
556 points (97.1% liked)

Atheist Memes

6663 readers
5 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] s@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol no. Photographs can easily be faked, especially with modern technology. Defer to those who have applied the scientific method, who have done solid research, and even do those things yourself to cross-reference; you should really know scientific literacy by now.

“Guy who does actual literal magic” is never real. “Guy who alone violently killed numerous women in London 1888-1891” (AKA Jack the Ripper), as a counterexample, is plausible but (as far as I know) has yet to be proven or disproven by historical evidence or other scientific means as to if it was one killer or multiple killers. “Guy whom historians generally agree did XYZ and had such and such characteristics based on their study of historical evidence and use of the scientific method” is virtually guaranteed to be real within a level of approximation (as in, even if we don’t know John Doe’s middle name was Jack, John Jack Doe still existed but only slightly different from how we know him).

taken to it’s logical conclusion - leads us to believe virtually nobody existed prior to that advent of photography.

That has the logical weight of Last Thursdayism or The Truman Show Delusion. Like technically it’s possible, but there are way more assumptions being made about what it obscured than there are assumptions being made about what is observed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“Guy who does actual literal magic” is never real.

Sure. But a person doesn't cease to exist because they've been canonized by the Vatican, either. The post-mortem mythology built up around a person isn't evidence of their absence. The leap from "Jesus didn't literally bring a guy three-days-dead back to the land of the living" to "No popular rabbi evangelizing a reformist vision of the Jewish faith existed in Jerusalem two thousand years ago" is enormous.

Hell, even the character Spiderman has its roots in the daredevils of the 1930s, 40s, and 50s, famous for free climbing across New York real estate. To hold up a copy of the latest Tom Holland movie and say "This is absurd! He's literally doing wizard magic! Nobody has ever dressed as a spider and climbed up the side of a building!" Like, obviously false.

That has the logical weight of Last Thursdayism or The Truman Show Delusion.

An even more extreme take, sure. But when you're dealing with historical events that are thousands of years old, its a game you kinda-sorta have to play. Otherwise, you don't know where Greek History ends and Mythology begins.