Selfhosted

60693 readers

513 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

307

How to Build a Powerful Reverse Proxy Firewall for Blocking the Evil Web-Scraping Robot Hordes from Hell (cheapskatesguide.org)

submitted 10 months ago by kjo@discuss.tchncs.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My goals for this firewall were mostly to provide better robot blocking and perhaps some more powerful DDoS protection than my Raspberry Pi 3 web server is capable of delivering. I still have to do some testing before I will know if my new firewall actually provides either of those, but at least I now have the additional ability to run multiple physical web servers on my LAN. Exploring that should be fun, and fun is a very important component of running a home web server.

Not my article. Just sharing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It seems goofy to me — I wish we had collectively picked a term with more oomph.

I’m struggling to come up with an alternative though.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

toasters

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So say we all.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

so say we all

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All of this has happened before.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

does that mean we get to burn down textile mills?

[–] addie@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm still trying to make 'sloppers' happen. Perfectly describes the lack of thought that goes into what they produce.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 10 months ago

I like 'sloppers' as a term for the morons distrubing and consuming the shit that the clankers are excreting.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah and the make a mess of network traffic that slows everything down.

Sludgers works too, but I like slop for the LLM output, so it makes sense as the bot term of derision.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

clankers make the end result that sloppers (meatbags) eat up ;)

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Stealing a slur from Star Wars and engaging in traditional name calling to show we disapprove of uncreative slop.

We can't even think of an original term. We can't think of a novel way to shit on AI. We just copy what everyone else is doing to make fun of the plagiarism machine.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

Why does everyone think the term came from Star Wars? I know it was used in steampunk before then, and google suggests it goes back to a 1958 article about robots. Sorry, not trying to be pedantic, just feels like a lot of people give Star Wars unjust credit for things they didn't actually create.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

No no - it’s not plagiarism; it’s standardization.