this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
226 points (86.9% liked)

Games

38454 readers
1768 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In another bullshit move by Nintendo this time around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can you think of a better way to keep it mostly out of the hands of scalpers?

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They must enter a unique switch serial number (that corresponds with inventory) to make the purchase? Don't see why it has to be contigent on a subscription.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

That would work if serial numbers weren't visible without even opening the box the device came in, and I'm they are even included on the receipt for the device. Scalpers would absolutely have a ton of serial numbers just lying around from unsold devices, or even devices they sold and just hope the owner of won't bother attempting a purchase of the thing they are scalping.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make enough of them that scalping isn't profitable.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's a fine solution long term I guess, but things take time to be made.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Put the onus on the retailer to limit how many units a single customer can purchase. Why would Nintendo give a single fuck about scalpers, anyway?