▲ 864 ▼ This is the technology worth trillions of dollars huh (europe.pub) submitted 1 year ago by HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth to c/technology@lemmy.world 236 comments fedilink hide all child comments This is the technology worth trillions of dollars huh
[–] villainy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (8 children) Every American I know does pronounce it like Connedicut 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Really? Everyone I know calls it kinetic-cut. But I group up in new england. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) "Kinetic" with a hard "T" like posh Brit is saying it to the queen? Everyone I've ever heard speaking US English pronounces it with a rolled "t" like "kinedic" so the alternate pronunciation still reads like it'd have a "d" sound permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) This phenomenon is called "T flapping" and it is common in North American English. I got into an argument with my dad who insisted he pronounces the T's in 'butter' when his dialect, like nearly all North Americans pronounces the word as 'budder'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children) budder is softer than t flapping. further forward with the tongue on the palate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago That's how I've always heard it pronounced on the rare occasions anybody ever mentions it. But I've never been to that part of the US so maybe the accents different there? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Really? Everyone I know calls it kinetic-cut. But I group up in new england. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) "Kinetic" with a hard "T" like posh Brit is saying it to the queen? Everyone I've ever heard speaking US English pronounces it with a rolled "t" like "kinedic" so the alternate pronunciation still reads like it'd have a "d" sound permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) This phenomenon is called "T flapping" and it is common in North American English. I got into an argument with my dad who insisted he pronounces the T's in 'butter' when his dialect, like nearly all North Americans pronounces the word as 'budder'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children) budder is softer than t flapping. further forward with the tongue on the palate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago That's how I've always heard it pronounced on the rare occasions anybody ever mentions it. But I've never been to that part of the US so maybe the accents different there? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) "Kinetic" with a hard "T" like posh Brit is saying it to the queen? Everyone I've ever heard speaking US English pronounces it with a rolled "t" like "kinedic" so the alternate pronunciation still reads like it'd have a "d" sound permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) This phenomenon is called "T flapping" and it is common in North American English. I got into an argument with my dad who insisted he pronounces the T's in 'butter' when his dialect, like nearly all North Americans pronounces the word as 'budder'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children) budder is softer than t flapping. further forward with the tongue on the palate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) This phenomenon is called "T flapping" and it is common in North American English. I got into an argument with my dad who insisted he pronounces the T's in 'butter' when his dialect, like nearly all North Americans pronounces the word as 'budder'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children) budder is softer than t flapping. further forward with the tongue on the palate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children) budder is softer than t flapping. further forward with the tongue on the palate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's an approximation, but the t is partially vocalized giving it a 'd' sound even if it's not made exactly the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) i just thought we were getting technical about the linguistics. i got and use both words frequently, thought the distinction might be appreciated. the difference is so subtle we sometimes have to ask each other which one we're referring to. i'm willing to bet it shows up more on my face than in my voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* I appreciate the discussion, I get out of my depth pretty quickly on the topic being a linguistic hobbyist rather than someone with actual education and background. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago That's how I've always heard it pronounced on the rare occasions anybody ever mentions it. But I've never been to that part of the US so maybe the accents different there? permalink fedilink source parent