Note: Btw I don't endorse this ruling. I just thought it was important news to share

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

I am not too sure I understand what your objection to this article is. Ok gas is considered sustainable under some conditions. This doesn't seen to me like something contradicting that the EU Court ruling on Taxonomy sets a dangerous precedent. For me this is the point.

Did I get something wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    This is basically to allow projects to use fossil gas for a bit, until hydrogen or bio methane is available for the project. It takes years to built something like this and 2035 is only a decade away. That is very different from fossil gas is green period.

  • source
  • parent