Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Dude, I’m so ready. Linux supports processors that old, by enthusiasts for free.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    This would almost certainly rule out Linux as an option. What Linux vendor feels comfortable committing to something, anything, for 15 years?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments