you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

No? They merely state that their results are consistent with one of Poore and Nemecek's findings. The methods, article scope, and more differ.

I'm not going to defend the article further. If you all want to believe a website over a scientific publication, feel free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments