this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
20 points (91.7% liked)

Casual Conversation

3075 readers
220 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There is a person I work with who I would consider my best friend. It's weird though because in some ways we are absolute polar opposites. I'm very liberal, atheist...hell I'm actually vehemently anti-religion. My friend is deep in the MAGA cult and incredibly devoutly religious with very "traditional" views that were probably a lot more common in the 1950s (doesn't believe in evolution despite having a strong science background; some other views I will not mention for fear of getting in trouble with users on here).

On paper, you wouldn't think two radically different people would get along like that. But she's also legitimately one of the nicest people I know. She's funny, goofy, kind, and just an all around blast to work with. When I first started working at my job, there wasn't much in the way on conversation. People just worked hard and didn't say much. She was the first person to really talk to me there and slowly make me feel welcomed over time. We have deep conversations sometimes and other times we just act goofy. There was a time where she didn't have power or water for multiple days and I had her family stay with me (multiple young kids, a husband, an in-law) and I'd do it again in a heartbeat. She talks a lot and always has something to say even when I don't, which I've always found helpful as someone who is socially anxious and doesn't always have something to say. Anyway, she's a great person despite our polar opposite life philosophies and viewpoints.