360
Google just broke all third-party YT clients, including yt-dlp; a full JS implementation is now required. (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I have a program for download yt stuff, will that also break being a full program or is it going to have the same flaw?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Yeah, the lockdown is a YT thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Rip my preferred downloader I guess, new version that would update is subscription based.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Tartube uses yt-dlp, until Google implements real DRM ala Widevine on YT, which I fully expect them to if they're locking things down this drastically, I mentioned how you can get yt-dlp working again-for now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I actually doubt it will go that far. They're far more concerned with those precious ad views, and the slowdown from encrypting/decrypting every feed everywhere would almost certainly cause a noticeable downward trend in those ad views.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's Google, I wouldn't trust them any further than I can throw their Pixel phones. They straight-up admitted recently to breaking the open web, they'll do anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't know, man. Pixel phones are pretty light, so I bet you could throw one pretty far.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's a figure of speech to mean you don't trust something or someone's products.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I'm aware, but usually people use something large and heavy as their example of the thing to be thrown, because they wouldn't be able to throw it far. The short or non-existent throw distance acts as a metaphor for the lack of trust. For example, I wouldn't trust Google farther than I can throw one of their servers. Those clowns are absolutely not to be trusted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Fair enough. I mean, they'll never not pay attention to whatever moves the money, of course. Brrr! Line most go up! But they're so far up their own asses who really knows why they do what they do. Cause I'm pretty sure the only thing they've figured out is what their own farts smell like!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent