Technology

43,397 readers

2,177 active

151 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago

moderators

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

DeepSeek AI Models Are Unsafe and Unreliable, Finds NIST-Backed Study (www.techrepublic.com)

submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The article says that DeepSeek was easier to unalign to obey the users instruction. It has less refusals and they make that sound like a bad thing.

If anything, it's a glowing positive praise for the model. Looks like Western media is starting a campaign to gaslight people into thinking that users being able to tune the model to work the way they want is somehow a negative.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago*

The article says that DeepSeek was easier to unalign to obey the users instruction. It has less refusals and they make that sound like a bad thing.

From a state control perspective it is. It's unreliable for state purposes. The AI is less able to stick to a programmed narrative.

permalink

fedilink

source