this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
204 points (97.2% liked)

World News

50286 readers
1935 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh, the "locals depend on the revenue" argument. Haven't seen that in a while.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I invite you to go to Nepal and educate the people on taking a moral stand and cutting off their revenue. I'm sure they'd be very receptive.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

You got that fucking backwards, sir.

One does not ask the oppressed to change the abusive relationship, one speaks to the pricks paying 50k to leave their actual feces and trash on a mountain to check a box.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

I agree with both of you.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That’s tangential but worth mentioning. At the very least I have an adopted brother over there that depends on tourists so yeah, I feel it’s a sensible argument. My whole point is that it is such a specific and hateful position… the guy should really chill down a bit.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At the very least I have an adopted brother over there that depends on tourists

That's the point, and that's why the guy is not "chill" about it.

Tourism is very much a colonial economy when there is income inequity. I am sorry that your adopted brother depends on tourists for income, but that does not justify the inequity.

If you were to hire a Sherpa in the Alps or Canada, you'd be paying a hell of a lot more for the privilege of the climb. So tell us again why these rich folks get away with paying so little...

When you make the argument that the locals depend on the income, you are also implying that it's OK the locals earn so little without these rich folks.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Nope, I’m not saying any of that. I’m just happy that he -specifically he who I very much know- can eat because some tourists pay him for his art. So in that frame it is not all negative. Whatever the price is really, he comes from living in a monastery in India to going back to his home country and being able to sustain himself with that money. System is not perfect but at least he eats.

If you worry about that you’ll have to consider all other inequalities in manufacturing as well… or in IT…. So why just that one example ?

[–] Frigidlollipop@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Id like to sneak in and offer an opposing argument here. I see what you are saying, but imagine if someone said poachers in Africa depend on the revenue from selling illegal wildlife goods. The idea is that even if its a reality now, it really isn't a good one, and if they COULD work away from it, it'd likely be better overall.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I would argue that poachers are criminals by definition…. Sherpas must less so.