No test measures intelligence. A test only measures you relative to the persons that wrote the test. – loosely quoting Asimov.

2007 is ancient history now. It is an interesting graph that one might correlate with a lack of meritocratic structure in society, but I'm on the low end cause I say this without looking up and reading the study. Pretty pictures evoke emotional blabbering bias and all that.

I Quit
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah, agreed.

Even America's sweet heart Taylor Swift. She's a billionaire and her groupies wind up paying $1300 to see a show. Then I heard she's writing a book. I mean how much do you need? She could be doing world tours for free, subsidizing ticket prices, I don't know, starting up a competitive company to Ticketmaster.

Elon Musk levels of income could friggin cure diseases or hunger or something or at least make a huge dent. Think about it. If he liquidated his entire net worth and gave up on his Nazi empire building he could use $490B on a good cause and STILL be a billionaire.

There was one guy though. I forgot his name. He signed that pact that Warren Buffett created where those who signed, pledged to give away all or most of there wealth. I think like two did it after they died but this one guy gave it all away while he was (is?) alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Billionares would have no bearing whatsoever on the same type of research being discussed. See my other comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, I disagree with your assessment. You're acting like oh there are only a few of them, but they control like 90% of the wealth in the world. How many billions of dollars do you think go into a single research topic? I'd also like to point out that it's uber rich people who also make the decisions. I can't prove that corporations prefer NOT to have a cure for diseases, because they make more money treating them, but I'm pretty sure IF they do, it ain't a poor person making that decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For this research it doesn't matter how much wealth they control if it's not even a suburb sized group of people globally who are billionaires, median income for ethical vs inethical groups would probably not move any statistically significant amount

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think you're missing the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I know you want to complain about unethical billionaires but the point here is about looking for a trend between ethics and income, not prevalence of unethical behaviour amongst billionaires

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment