this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
129 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25991 readers
2739 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The problem is that these guys are there to be punched. Like, they get off on it. They get paid to be punched. They openly court getting punched. It's their payday. The thing that will catapult them into the upper eschalons of the grifter scene. They're a entire cottage industry built around influencers lining up to be the next Horst Wessel.

This is a strategy that's put to best effect in countries like Israel, via their Settler movement. Civilian agitators move into a neighborhood and commit abhorrent crimes against the local population. Israeli military officials surround the village, waiting for local Palestinians to do anything in self-defense. If the Palestinians remain passive, the Settlers escalate. If they try to step in to rescue their friends or neighbors, the IDF open fire claiming they are defending Settlers from terrorist attacks.

What's the play in this kind of scenario? Idk. Ultimately, its not the Settlers/Influencers who are at the root of the violence. It is the military/paramilitary who use the radicalized civilians as an excuse to retaliate with lethal force. But they're not nearly so easy to displace as the civilians operating at the tip of the spear.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago

The puget is deep. The ocean is deep.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It didn't work for Charlie kirk, it won't work for them

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Charlie Kirk was swinging around $85M in his war chest, the year he died. That empire of FUD is going to be inherited by the next most sociopathic influencer.

Presumably, that's Bari Weiss.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Well... I'd wager there's more bullets in America then influencers. Ironically, this fact remains because of said influencers.