you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

I get how similar naming can be useful in knowing what sort of product you're getting and what it can be used to replace, but I dislike more how it is purposefully misleading. Shouldn't be allowed to call it that close to salmon without it containing any salmon. Same for other similar ingredient names where there's a chance of confusion.

A meat product being quirky and inverting the m so it is marketed as w'eat would just be... No.

  • source
  • parent