▲ 632 ▼ Free energy mod! (europe.pub) submitted 1 year ago by Steve@startrek.website to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works 268 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Amir@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago That's effectively what hybrid cars do. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (5 children) Essentially regenerative braking. Should work, though the question is how coat effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wrong question. Right question: When the fully torqued spring inevitably fails, who is liable for the deaths of the rider and nearby pedestrians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (3 children) Wrong question. That one is answered with a EULA. Right question: how often can we make that torque spring break, forcing the buyer to buy another one, without them realizing it's failure by design? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Wrong question. Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent [–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago F1 has been using this principle for years permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's just regenerative braking on a bike. Without batteries. In theory that idea isn't actually bad although I suspect in practise the mechanism would be extremely complicated and would be liable to jamming it in opportune moments. That said doing this electronically is already a thing, although not really in e-bikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago pretty sure hybrid cars have regenerative braking - the car uses the motion to recharge the battery when braking, going downhill, or coasting permalink fedilink source parent [–] BlackLodgeCooper@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago Dynamo lights work off a similar principle. It extracts energy from pedaling or the wheels spinning to power lights on the bike. You can feel the drag and it's probably about 5w of power. Really not a whole lot. About the same energy you'd save from wearing smooth socks or cleaning the chain for some perspective. The extra weight required to implement a solution like yours would probably rob the rider of any gains. But in a very theoretical sense it could work if the material weighed an insignificant amount. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Why flip a switch when you can just let the bike sense if it is going up or down hill? Would make hilly terrain a much smoother ride. Then again, if you do all that electrical, you already just have an electric bike. Which is even more versatile on flat ground. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago That's effectively what hybrid cars do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (5 children) Essentially regenerative braking. Should work, though the question is how coat effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wrong question. Right question: When the fully torqued spring inevitably fails, who is liable for the deaths of the rider and nearby pedestrians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (3 children) Wrong question. That one is answered with a EULA. Right question: how often can we make that torque spring break, forcing the buyer to buy another one, without them realizing it's failure by design? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Wrong question. Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wrong question. Right question: When the fully torqued spring inevitably fails, who is liable for the deaths of the rider and nearby pedestrians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (3 children) Wrong question. That one is answered with a EULA. Right question: how often can we make that torque spring break, forcing the buyer to buy another one, without them realizing it's failure by design? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Wrong question. Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (3 children) Wrong question. That one is answered with a EULA. Right question: how often can we make that torque spring break, forcing the buyer to buy another one, without them realizing it's failure by design? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Wrong question. Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Wrong question. Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Wrong question. Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago F1 has been using this principle for years permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's just regenerative braking on a bike. Without batteries. In theory that idea isn't actually bad although I suspect in practise the mechanism would be extremely complicated and would be liable to jamming it in opportune moments. That said doing this electronically is already a thing, although not really in e-bikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago pretty sure hybrid cars have regenerative braking - the car uses the motion to recharge the battery when braking, going downhill, or coasting permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago pretty sure hybrid cars have regenerative braking - the car uses the motion to recharge the battery when braking, going downhill, or coasting permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlackLodgeCooper@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago Dynamo lights work off a similar principle. It extracts energy from pedaling or the wheels spinning to power lights on the bike. You can feel the drag and it's probably about 5w of power. Really not a whole lot. About the same energy you'd save from wearing smooth socks or cleaning the chain for some perspective. The extra weight required to implement a solution like yours would probably rob the rider of any gains. But in a very theoretical sense it could work if the material weighed an insignificant amount. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Why flip a switch when you can just let the bike sense if it is going up or down hill? Would make hilly terrain a much smoother ride. Then again, if you do all that electrical, you already just have an electric bike. Which is even more versatile on flat ground. permalink fedilink source parent