you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 57 points 11 months ago* (15 children)

"never!" they cry, as the first Muslim Democratic Socialist is elected mayor of New York in a landslide.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    And the largest party in the Netherlands has a gay guy married to a guy from Argentina as leader.

    Which doesn't mean much, really, since the fascist party in Germany has a lesbian leader married to a lady from Sri Lanka who lives in Switzerland.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    ...in a landslide.

    Actually, for me, it was shockingly close. How could an absolute fraud like the Independent have gotten so many votes? How could there be so many people in a huge city like that could make such a terrible decision, seemingly based on making a string of prior, terrible conclusions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Weren't many millions of dollars spent directly against Mamdani?

    I'd say it's one of the most hope inspiring things I've seen, personally — given the propaganda roulette we're faced with in the MSM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    The mainstream media? Yeah, it's getting fricken' scary. The Washington post being taken over by Bezos, and CBS being recently taken over by... who is it again?

    But you're right, I wasn't totally accounting for all the manipulated voting. More and more, it seems that late-stage capitalism really is a tyrant...

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -21 points 11 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Article "We must stop inequality before it collapses civilization"

    topic "NY elected a socialist that will fight to lower inequality"

    so, are you like agreeing with the comment that things are changing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -5 points 11 months ago

    I’ve read the book. The analysis is great, it proposes some interesting ideas to possibly prevent collapse, but like the article states at the end, it’s unlikely. I would argue impossible, and communities should be organizing towards localization of production and self-sufficiency if they are to even survive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    unless inequality is vanquished

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Despite the possibility of avoiding collapse, Kemp remains pessimistic about our prospects. “I think it’s unlikely,” he says. “We’re dealing with a 5,000-year process that is going to be incredibly difficult to reverse, as we have increasing levels of inequality and of elite capture of our politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Okay looking further into the article makes me retract caring about the part I quoted. I agree that we're heading for the societal collapse stated there. The American empire is going to fall and I'm optimistic about that. Because, like Kemp says, that often improves the lives of the ordinary citizen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    It’s a global system, the world goes with it, and in the past collapses people had a place to escape to, a system to fall back on. We have no where to go this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    We don't need to go anywhere, we just need to take care of each other

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments