this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
703 points (99.7% liked)

News

28915 readers
4357 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 149 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Alternatively, the government must provide the name of the person or people who chose not to halt Alien Enemies Act deportations out of the U.S. despite his order — and Boasberg said he would refer them for prosecution.

Betting pool is open! Who do we think Drump and Co are going to throw under the bus this time?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

My money is on martial law, and the summary removal or execution of Boasberg.

Wish I was being sarcastic, but the odds of martial law or war being declared on Hitler's birthday - the 20th, are far too likely for my taste. It would be within Trump's character to simply murder his foes, regardless of their place in society.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, Hitler was born on weed day? How much better would the world have been if he had gotten into weed instead of coke and amphetamines?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 6 days ago

Probably would have become a Bob Ross type of artist, rather than a avatar of hatred.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Now I'm wondering if any of those betting sites have anything going on for these scenarios lmao

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Later:

In an alarming development, the White House slams judges by releasing a new executive order titled “Trump finds probable cause for the Judicial Branch to suck on deeze nuts”; Schumer and Jeffries urge cooperation and reconciliation by wringing their hands and asking you for $13 before midnight to meet a nonexistent deadline. This message brought to you by Brawndo: The Thirst Mutilator!

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oooo a slam! We love slams! The drama! The excitement!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

AND HERE COMES SECRETARY POWELL FROM THE TOP ROPE!

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OH SHIT HILLARY IS DOING A DEMONIC SUMMONING RITUAL RINGSIDE AND ... BY ALL THINGS HOLY HIDE YOUR KIDS ITS ZOMBIE JIMMY CARTER READY TO DROP THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HAMMER!!!!!

Oh shit this is getting good

I voted Trump coz he's gonna fix the Conomy. Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

No one. He will just start dealing out pardons like it's a poker game. The US Justice System is dead.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one. No need. Just ignore the court like he always has. Fucking joke.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And the court will keep wagging fingers.

A serious judge would deputize a citizen militia to arrest him.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A serious judge would have ensured a multiple time convicted felon was not permitted to become a dictator in the formerly most powerful country in the world.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lol that is not within the control of a random individual judge.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It no longer surprises me that murica is in the state it is in. It did at first, I admit. Perhaps it's my age. Or my general belief that people are good and care at least some, for their fellow man. Especially their own families, neighbors and friends regardless of their background.

But that assumption is continually proven wrong lately. People willfully blind themselves to the obvious. They refuse to admit when everything has broken around them. They live in this weird place of denial grasping at things that are no longer effective or even present.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Many of us are well aware that the system has been broken for years and that this was a likely result, but the system also made it very difficult to stop. (The mathematically determined 2 party stem we get with first past the post voting for instance).

Once democrats blew it by giving up local power, they and the country, were done.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Expecting change without forcing it and ensuring it happens. Sitting back and blaming the politicians. You are the citizens who put them in power and you are the citizens who can remove them from that power. No one else. You. Your countrymen. Your families and friends. You.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can't they just claim it's an "official act?"

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That ONLY protects the president, and only from crimes he commits as official acts.

Now, we all know the mental gymnastics the GOP can do are impressive, but ignoring a court order is not an official act.

The deportation itself? That's the act that he's immune from.

[–] hamFoilHat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would have thought that paying hush money to a hooker wouldn't be an official act, but whatever.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump was convicted of that but the judge ruled there should be no penalty.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

"He's got so much potential"

If the president never orders them to do anything as policy then they can't really be held accountable can they?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President's minions and officials.

Trump is never going to round up the prisoners and fly the plane to El Salvador all by himself. He's got people to do that, and those people can be served with court orders and criminal contempt process.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And then if Trump just pardons them?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Correct. And then Trump just pardons them.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President’s minions and officials.

Not directly, but any employee or agent has no liability if they are following legal orders of their employer. So no - they cannot be prosecuted either.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

State employees aren't specifically beholden to the agency who hires and fires them.

The state has an executive, legislative and judicial branch.

If they follow an executive order but contravene a law, or contravene a court order that they know about (since only the courts make final interpretations of law) - my understanding is that they have no immunity.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That's not what the Nuremberg trials found

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The immunity ruling also retained determination of an act to be official up to the courts.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's meant to deter the "only following orders" Nazi defense.

In theory there should be checks and balances which prevent anything absurdly fascist, it's expected that it would be halted before it happens, but I suspect those who wrote this into the Constitution didn't count on the level of fascism we're seeing now.

We'll see how it works out.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago (18 children)

In theory there should be checks and balances

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That’s not entirely accurate. His immunity for “official acts of the office of the President” is to be determined by the presiding judge. An “official act” has yet to be defined, and there is nothing written about charges. He can and should be charged as well, so we can begin to define the limits of his immunity. Refusing to challenge it in fear that it will be overturned, is exactly what he’s hoping for.

load more comments (2 replies)