you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Who said it had to be used by itself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    You're really willing to die on the hill of poop camera subscriptions, I'm not willing to waste time diving further into the subject. You're ignorant of the topic, which is fine, but I won't be the one explaining further.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I'm not dying on anything, I'm just having a discussion. It's what I come here to do. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine, but the name calling is unnecessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    you're not having a discussion, you're sealioning. You're not providing any arguments or evidence in favour of your point, just requesting endless amounts of information from your interlocutor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I haven't provided any arguments because this isn't an argument, it's a discussion. I haven't made an affirmative position either way, at any time. I'm just asking questions and learning. Sorry if that offends you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Except you made the argument about professional analysis of your poop.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I did no such thing and you know I didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    is not going to give you any information that you can't derive by simply looking at the feces yourself

    Yes and you don't have to hire a plumber to fix your sink if you're a plumber.

    The point is:

    1. Professional analysis
    2. (more importantly) Automated logging (no pun intended), potentially for human medical review periodically, or at a later date.

    That you?

  • source
  • parent