Title is quite self-explanatory, reason I wonder is because every now and then I think to myself "maybe distro X is good, maybe I should try it at some point", but then I think a bit more and realise it kind of doesn't make a difference - the only thing I feel kinda matters is rolling vs non-rolling release patterns.

My guiding principles when choosing distro are that I run arch on my desktop because it's what I'm used to (and AUR is nice to have), and Debian on servers because some people said it's good and I the non-rolling release gives me peace of mind that I don't have to update very often. But I could switch both of these out and I really don't think it would make a difference at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I switched to Arch Linux for the memes, but now am unable to leave it. I've tried a few dozen distros, but none of them are as good as arch for me, I always come back to it. It's like arch is my perfect distro.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you remember any examples of things that made you turn away from those other distros?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    Mostly the package manager and even the rolling distros' packages being more outdated than arch everytime. AUR is also very nice to have. The only distro I found that did spike my interest alot was NixOS.

  • source
  • parent