146
The US military is using the white supremacist Jerusalem Cross on its propaganda (www.thecanary.co)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/world@quokk.au
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (20 children)
[deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    The ADL is a ZioNazi hate org, no upstanding member of society should ever care what they say.

    https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2025/01/22/adl-defends-nazi-salutes/

    Likewise this is the same government hell bent on Israel slaughtering in the Middle East so they can have their rapture or whatever. There is no doubt this is related to white supremacism/Christian nationalism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    I agree, though I am of the opinion that in secular states (at least at home and in peace time) government officials (including the army) should not wear any religious iconography

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (8 children)

    I would say ideally not as they represent the state and thus should not wear iconography of any sort for secular states.

    I also know that this might not be exactly practial in reality

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    for a lot of people that is asking them to renounce their religious beliefs in service of the national interest

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yes I see that problem and in the best case it would not be renouncing their beliefs not to wear something where it is not appropriate, but there are many other beliefs or reasons where one is excluded from official office/army, etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Similar to the original meaning of this post. Many countries forbid people to enter the military and similar office, if they are known to hold extreme believes (e.g. extreme right wing rhetoric has been used by them or such). Not always foolproof though

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I think you are correct as it is now. And I do agree, as it is right now it is not practical to be completely secular for people holding these offices.

    However, ideally, these groups would not need the recognition in this way as they ought to already have it otherwise and understanding that at some places some things are limited, should not discourage them to believe in what they want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    First, fuck the ADL. They are so pro-fascism their own logo is now a hate-symbol. Second, the Jerusalem cross on dozens of buildings doesn't sounds like a very significant Christian symbol. It's very contextual. Third, you clearly haven't looked very hard. Fourth, your conclusion is... really stupid. Stop being such a snowflake.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •