this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
144 points (91.4% liked)

Fuck AI

2561 readers
950 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

The images in the quoted post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The argument is that they are both simply tools. It's completely wrong, but that's what it is.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 11 points 1 week ago

I understand the point of the argument, but as you say — it's a false premise because only one of them is an art tool. The other is a faulty clip art machine that literally steals from artists.

[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think the argument is that some people can't afford a nice drawing tablet or drawing supplies, so all they have is a mouse that is "impossible" to draw with, and AI allows them to... "create". source: bottom-left post in the image

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 1 week ago

Stick + lighter + stone surface = big dragon mommy milkers, just fine.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago

Even before generative AI I saw these arguments in music production that they had to pirate stuff because they couldn’t afford Serum/Abelton Live etc.

Never mind that there have been free digital music tools for decades now. Maybe a little clunkier but money has never been a barrier towards creating art.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you can't afford a box of crayons and some paper, how the hell could you afford a computer?

Edit: by "you", I'm of course referring to people who would make the argument. I know your reply wasn't actually making the argument.