this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2554 readers
1024 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Completely untrue.

The environmental impact would still be as bad, it would still spout out misinformation, it would still scrape for art against people's will, the images would still be shit and not art anyway, and would still make an intellectual sinkhole.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If society isn't built around competition and exploitation, the usage of AI can be limited to renewable energy. Whereas now, every gram of hydrocarbon and uranium will be burned to win the race for global domination.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Great you ignored my other issues with that, but also you don't think people would collectively be using those resources? Also the water used for those ai servers isn't great.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with your other points.

It depends on the type of society if people use all those resources. With AI they will use them much, much faster.

Water doesn't have to be a problem in places where there is enough water.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] seeigel@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you tell me the time of the relevant argument, please.

Otherwise I would think that global warming leads to warmer oceans which should cause more evaporation and rain.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, let me explain it simply then.

You remember the water cycle from elementary school? You just described it. Well, there isn't an infinite amount of water on earth. So when you take water out of the water cycle and lock it away, like in jugs of water or in cooling systems for massive computers, it doesn't get evaporated and return to the environment. It stays in its jug.

So the more people store water away, the less water we have to use elsewhere.

As for the timeline, this is already happening now.

They go into more detail in the video. It's long but it is funny.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry but that humor is not my style. I would be glad if you could tell me the relevant moments.

Locking all water away, how is that possible? Have you seen the size of the Pacific?

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'd suggest watching the video if you want more details, but the amount of freshwater we can use is much smaller than the oceans.

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok cool make a true communist society and then I can.