you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

But sharing code is when a license like LGPL really has an effect in what you must do to comply..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (4 children)

    I'm not sure I follow that sentence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Everyone is free to edit, compile and use LGPL licensed code however you want on your PC. A DMCA can't stop that, so it won't make sense for someone to think that. At the time you share software (as a binary which used that LPGL licensed code, or the code itself) is when you are legally compelled to follow the license (hosting code on github).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Ah right. So I guess my point was: the DMCA takedown doesn't necessarily force them to publish the code on GitHub, although luckily in this case they did end up doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments