25
CachyOS vs arch (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm going to switch to arch for my general-purpose laptop, since I feel like kubuntu is not enough for me, I want to try a tiling WM and do some ricing.

I'm still undecided between plain arch or CachyOS, because that optimisation looks promising and I also game on my laptop.

The fact is that CachyOS seems more "bloated" with some unnecessary packages, so what do you suggest me? A simple arch installation, arch using the cachy-linux kernel and its optimisations or a debloated CachyOS install? Thank you all in advance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago

There are many meta-packages you can install. Im on arch for years, it works well as long as you dont constantly tinker with it.

I usually set up an arch install with the desktop environment and some basic setup where I can use it for my needs, then I use clonezilla to make a mirror of the install. Once a month I update the mirror by itself. In case I bork my main install, I use the mirror to rewrite my main system, no need to reinstall. I guess having a cheap 500gb ssd around pays for iself in this usecase.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent