you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

The biblical jesus didn't exist. There's evidence that a Jesus existed, and was notable enough to piss off the Roman administration.

A lot of the biblical stories are older than jesus however, so he has a lot of existing "lore" tacked on to him. He was likely a nomadic wise/holy man who built up a bit of a following and was then crucified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    there’s one mention of a jesus that fits, in roman records. one time, one person, wrote a name down.
    could that be a real person or maybe a story about a person?
    not just biblical stories predated jesus, but the entire story is exactly the same as Zoroaster.
    from the exact same region, exact same people, “first recorded in the mid-6th century BCE”.
    some people just made a reboot of Zoroastrianism… probably the romans, on purpose, to make their combo-religion to govern all romans (catholicism)
    jesus did not exist at all

  • source
  • parent