this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
775 points (98.3% liked)

News

28939 readers
4347 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump had to reverse his aggressive tariff rhetoric after CEOs from Walmart, Target, and Home Depot warned of empty shelves and higher prices due to supply chain disruptions.

Investors reacted negatively to his threats against Fed Chair Jerome Powell, prompting a market sell-off.

Trump backtracked, expressing optimism on a China trade deal and now denying plans to fire Powell.

Global markets remain volatile, and the IMF cited Trump’s trade war as a “major negative shock” to global growth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would China do anything that helps us pick ourselves up and onto our feet? This is the goal they and Russia have been working towards for decades.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Nah-uh. No blaming China or Russia on this one. The United States did this squarely to themselves with the world pleading otherwise. They inserted their own head in the vice and started spinning the handle.

Sure, it aligns with the communist block's benefit, but the US really needs to be held accountable for its own idiocy on this one. Its the first step in recovery.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it aligns with the communist block’s benefit

Neither Russia nor China are communist anymore. Russia is run by corrupt capitalists and has been since the 1980s, and the only thing Communist about China is the name of the totalitarian party that runs its government, which consists of a mix of state-funded and private capitalist enterprise.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China is very much a socialist economy

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

China is very much a socialist economy

Really? The workers control the means of production? From here, it looks like state capitalism augmented by inconsistently regulated private enterprise (which sometimes leads to the entrepreneurs disappearing when they've neglected to grease the correct set of Party palms).

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The workers control the means of production?

More than 60% of the Chinese economy is state owned and controlled, and as of I think a year ago they democratized Chinese company structures by mandating assemblies of employee representatives. The state having majority control and direction of the Chinese economy and market is the primary complaint of western trade partners, I don't know why people are always surprised by this.

I get that people really do not like the authoritarian aspects of the Chinese government, but state-controlled economies are pretty much the exact intent behind 'worker-controlled means of production' in marxism.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Socialism isn't just when the government does things. In between workers and the state needs to be a free and functioning democracy.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that famous part of Das Capital where marx coins the term "democracy of the proletariat"

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In Marxist philosophy, the dictatorship of the proletariat is a condition in which the proletariat, or the working class, holds control over state power. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the transitional phase from a capitalist to a communist economy, whereby the post-revolutionary state seizes the means of production, mandates the implementation of direct elections on behalf of and within the confines of the ruling proletarian state party, and institutes elected delegates into representative workers' councils that nationalise ownership of the means of production from private to collective ownership.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

on behalf of and within the confines of the ruling proletarian state party

Yup.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You act like that's different than a democracy, please define why.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

A 'dictatorship of the proletariat' has elements of democracy, but it is explicitly not the same as a liberal democracy (nor is it really the same as a straight-out dictatorship). It's possible that some people prefer the Trotsky version of socialist states (one where multiple socialist parties might compete for power), but the ML single-party version is still very much within marxist theory.

The Chinese political system is democratic, just not in the same ways a western democracy might be. Western liberals seem to either not know (?) how the Chinese system works, or miss-understand what 'democracy' means as it pertains to Marx's 'dictatorship of the proletariat'. Either way, @explodicle@sh.itjust.works seems to be operating under a liberal-democratic understanding of democracy, but that's really not a given in marxist theory.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What "communist" block are you talking about? Is this 1989?

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you take what I said very literally. The Chinese and the Russians are concluding, I'm sure you would agree.

[–] mtmtchy@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Colliding, colloidally.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Of course, spelling was never my strong suit.

I do appreciate being corrected. Thank you...

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm starting to feel like this is a controversial opinion, but maybe the American people should be the ones holding their own government accountable? Interventionism is the worst way to fix a country and I very much doubt it even could be done for a country like America.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am hoping the US splits apart, allowing the red states to destroy themselves. Conservatism is a cancer, and the condition would be easier to excise if it was a solid tumor.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Too many innocent people will be taken down as the cult self-destructs.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

We can just show up in ICE uniforms and take them to the free state.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

One way or another, the cult will murder people just because, and will continue to do so until the cult is extinguished. It is better to hasten that by being willing to oppose the regime. Many people are being trafficked by ICE.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Difficult to argue against, except America is doing this too us as well, and we don't get a vote.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

All the more reason to not do anything about it. Let America implode and their interventionist power also takes a hit.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago

It's been fucking wild as a resident of a non-us country seeing some of the commentary coming up. We must radical empathy! How dare other countries take advantage of X Y or Z? The shoe is on the other foot, and by GOD is it a problem if anyone but the US starts doing what the US has been doing to everyone else on the planet my entire freakin' life

We all know they're propaganda riddled exceptionalists but goddaaaamn. Need to learn to accept cause, effect and consequence

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump provided China an excellent excuse to start a trade war and look like the heroes while doing it. This is absolutely Trump's fault, but China has no reason to not take full advantage of it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

TBF we already started it ourselves

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's true. The US has been interfering in other country's domestic affairs for decades. Organising the odd coup, overthrowing elected leaders. Suddenly people are shocked to learn that it can work both ways.

A country with strong democratic institutions are pretty resilient to these tactics. You might not trust the politicians, but you trust the officials, the military and the courts.

It seems that the US has dismantled trust in these institutions for a long time. It has let corporations run the show. So Russia and China have an easier task.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A country with strong democratic institutions are pretty resilient to these tactics.

That's a bit tautological, like "It they could break it, it needed fixing anyway."

And that's a bit too much like "If Hitler could invade France, it's the French's fault for not fighting back harder."

Russia has been at war against the American people since Putin and traitorous US oligarchs imposed Trump on us in his first term. It's victim-blaming to say that's the American people's fault.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, the famous denial of fascists in your own country.

YOU VOTED IN TRUMP WITH A MAJORITY KNOWING HE IS FASCIST.

This is squarely the fault of the American people. Lack of education and political will might be to blame, but to say that you are victims is such a farce that I don't believe you live in reality.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

He won by razor thin margins and many didn't even vote. So yeah, most Americans are victims here.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago

A minority didn't vote for trump, which is what you meant to say, I think. And those who didn't vote might as well have voted for him. Genocide protest or not, your country didn't care and is not educated enough to care about fascism.

Such selfishness has never been seen before in a people as what is seen in the USA. Trump is the result of this lack of caring for others. This is why you don't have universal healthcare or other such services.

If you had any empathy as a nation, you would still be the greatest on the planet. How far you have fallen in such a short time.

Karma, unfortunately, is real, and your chickens have come home to roost.

$7.25/hrs minimum wage in the richest country on the face of the earth shows how much you guys really care about each other.

I could go on, but it wouldn't motivate you enough to revolt, so why would I bother.

You are a nation of temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure your allegory is very apt.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Oh so we're denying that Russia and China led disinformation campaigns squared solely at disrupting American politics for decades? Are we also ignoring the Murdochs from Australia?

Just wanted to get that straight before I started saying whatever the fuck I want.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

The embarrassing thing is a lot of that disinformation was shared on social media networks that were created in the US.

Creating the tool that your enemy uses effectively against you is not a good look.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i believe russia be to blame, it kinda obvious weakeaning america helps putin, it has been his goal for 10years,.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

it has been his goal for 10years

Trump was getting fat on Russian mob money since the 1980s, probably as a reward for him ratting out the Italian mob to Giuliani, which created expansion opportunities for the Bratva.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

putin ramped up his misinformation, conveniently around the time he was elected , '16-17 on reddit we saw significant purges for the very first time, and peoples sensitivites as massively increased. my very first bans of an og account around that time.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mate, the Murdoch's? America's lap dog newspaper moguls.

They're you're mouth piece of shit trying to force Australia to be more like you sepppos

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Rupert Murdoch was born in Australia, what even are you talking about?

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm saying that Murdoch doesn't work for Australians and our interests. He's a lapdog of the US

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Murdoch has never served the interest of any state. He has relentlessly pursued his agenda, which is to undermine the centrist quasi-democracies in English-speaking countries and to promote nationalist authoritarianism.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

And bailed his citizanship the instant the US proved more likely to give him the easily manipulated press he wanted

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

russia maybe, because putins directing trump to do this, more or less it helps russia in the long run.

"Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake."