Fuck Cars

parent

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

you mean bike path, right?

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago

No, I don't.

Don't be pedantic, especially when you don't know what you're talking about.

parent

[+] quick_snail@feddit.nl -12 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Fuck bike lanes. This gives the road to bikes, and forces cars to go slower

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago (1 child)

it's really irritating to cycle in front of an impatient driver even when there's a 20km speed limit and a red light waiting ahead (some are irresistibly attracted to red lights. They want to drive as quickly as possible to just sit there and stare at it 🤷

👉🔴👈

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -2 points 8 months ago*

It's really fun to force cars to go slower than bikes. Fuck cars.

parent

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You're in the wrong community my dude

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

And also not understanding of the average Rochester hills driver.

parent

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Nope. Fuck cars. All roads should be for cyclists.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 8 months ago

Bike lanes give guaranteed space for bikes, whereas a bike-compatible road can end up with road hogging cars giving no space for bikes, and I'm booked having to "filter through" when there's traffic - which also increases risks for the cyclists

parent

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

You can do what you want but kids use bikes too while making unpredictable misjudged decisions.