you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

They couldnt give a rats ass about peedtrians

Apparently in this case the pedestrian infrastructure is explicitly also there for bicycles. Mixing bicycles and pedestrians is not a good idea. OP calls this "good infrastructure" in the title. It would be good infrastructure, if the bicycles had their own lane, there clearly is enough space for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    mixing bicycles and pedestrians is perfectly fine, you only get problems when people don't have anywhere to bike quickly.

    Most cyclists are happy to go 15km/h or slower, which works flawlessly with pedestrians so long as volumes of either aren't huge. But there's always some percentage of cyclists who want/need to go 20+km/h, which is only acceptable if there's barely any traffic at all.

    Frankly it can be really nice to mix slow cyclists and pedestrians, because it means more opportunity for people to talk to each other. I have several times met people i know while on my bike, and because my city at most separates cyclists from pedestrians with paint it means i can just stop and have a chat with them, it just feels nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment