Selfhosted

60426 readers

317 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Alternatives to Mattermost (feddit.org)

submitted 5 months ago by Harald_im_Netz@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey there,

I'm on the search for an alternative to Mattermost for a small institution I'm working with. Mattermost was the strongest contender for our needs, yet they changed their policy regarding self-hosted instances. The factor that killed it for us, is the hard cap on 250 registered users, as we potentially might need to commodate more than that.

Rocket.Chat has similar caps.

We found Zulip, and it seems as it might be what we are looking for, but we haven't tested yet. Nonetheless, I wanted to address this community, as you may have another good idea?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There is also Nextcloud Talk, but it can be a bit overwhelming to set up (needs the high-performance backend for video and stuff). But, it's entirely self-hosted and has no user cap as far as I am aware.

[–] Harald_im_Netz@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, the high-performance backend is — sadly! — no good for us.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not sure what the performance would look like for hundreds of users