this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
794 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23251 readers
3021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It’s the golfing. And the grifting, that too.

Edit: also, flights to deport citizens to gulags.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's also that cutting doesn't necessarily lead to spending less. I can cut 50 dollars on lunch, but then I end up real hungry, get fired and can't resist a honey bun from the vending machine.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Its not even that.

It is throwing away your jacket because you don't want to go out for lunch in the middle of the day. And then realizing you still need that jacket to get to and from work and having to buy a new one. And THEN buying lunch anyway because you are hungry.

A few articles have done a great job of documenting it but it boils down to the problem being the fundamental argument of WHY they are doing this. Officially their stance is to move fast, break things, and then repair what they actually needed. Except those repairs cost a LOT of time and money.

And... to add on to the brutally beaten metaphor: It also costs money to get rid ofy our old jacket because you can't just throw it in the trash. You have to drive down to a good will to drop it off. Because government employees have PTO that needs to be paid out and so forth.

[–] 96ToyotaCamry@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It is absolutely incredible that the only thing that outweighs their malice is their gross incompetence, which for better or worse may be our saving grace in undoing this mess

Any articles you'd recommend?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump: "They get PTO? Don't bother paying them, it is money better spent on visiting the Olympics." (Millions of dollars later, he leaves within 30 minutes of entering the stadium.) "So dull, those so-called foreign women throwing balls. Arrest them, they clearly are men in drag."

...As ever, my well of sarcasm has become dryer than a desert. You can throw just about anything malicious or stupid at the wall, and it would be a plausible scenario with this regime. :(

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

But what if you make a department of Honey Bun Efficiency? There is surely a simple solution for your fiscal crisis.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean we were deporting people at higher numbers than Trump has for as long as I know. Trump's just spending more money to deport less. Some might call it horrible money management skills.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I’m sure he’s paying El Salvador, and for all these flights, and then for creating and distributing all of these propaganda videos and Kristi Noem tv commercials. Have to make a big spectacle about it. That’s not cheap.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

he paying a specific airline, the one that exclusively deports people, not any of the commercial ones.