▲ 1107 ▼ Body positivity (europe.pub) submitted 6 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 months ago (11 children) Is that One-punch-man and Foot-sole-face-man? permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] meejle@piefed.world 26 points 6 months ago (10 children) It's AI slop permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) ~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pipe01@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (7 children) Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meejle@piefed.world 26 points 6 months ago (10 children) It's AI slop permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) ~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pipe01@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (7 children) Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) ~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pipe01@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (7 children) Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) ~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pipe01@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (7 children) Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pipe01@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (7 children) Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (6 children) Oh, you're right. AI slop it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children) The nature of its creation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) It seems someone made it That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down. Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture? Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent