this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
65 points (92.2% liked)

Selfhosted

60426 readers
209 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In case you didn't hear TrueNAS is going partially closed source. However, there seems to be a lack of alternatives.

Any ideas on what to move to?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Straight up barebones Linux.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's likely what I'll end up doing

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 1 points 3 months ago

I've been running straight Ubuntu with ZFS-on-Linux since 18.04, and it has been smooth sailing. If you're running a lot of containerized things it's very convenient to just be able to bind mount ZFS dataset into containers.

Normally I prefer CentOS/RockyLinux, or some other EL distribution, but in this case I really appreciate that Canonical isn't purist enough to ship ZFS as a loadable kernel module that is guaranteed to be in sync with the shipped kernel. And don't have to deal with DKMS.

[–] jafra@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Alpine Linux might also be interesting.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I think alpine qualifies as barebones Linux, generally.