you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    Remarkable that you can copypaste all that and still can't comprehend what was done in 1984 and what was done in 2014.

    If you find a way to represent our existing Milky Way galaxy with a procedural algorithm and a seed that can be run in a reasonable time on any current computer or even a cluster (say, running for a few dozen years), you're welcome to claim the Nobel prize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    How about you reread the thread instead, see that it's about accurately reproducing existing stars, and realize that you indeed have a comprehension problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Wow, it's really a damn mess in your head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments