you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 6 months ago (6 children)

DNA has a limited number of genes. Considering the enormous amount of functions they need to encode, the number of genes for each function becomes relatively small. 8 billion people and thousands of generations, we’re bound to have duplicates.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    That's not exactly true. A lot of DNA is redundant, and a lot of DNA is dead code that doesn't do anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Since you’ve only been told that you’re wrong, and I was also under the impression that there was a lot of junk DNA in our genome, I did a little digging and found this article that explains the progression of our understanding pretty well: https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/human-dna-98-of-your-genetic-code-is-junk-or-is-it

    The TLDR is that the original junk DNA hypothesis is based on the fact that only ~2% of DNA is actually used in mapping out protein-construction. That was generally supported by the science from the 70’s to the early 2000’s. What scientists have found in the decades since then is that a lot of what DNA does involves regulating activity in the cell and responding to changing circumstances.

  • source
  • parent