51
Writers Are Going to Extremes to Prove They Didn’t Use AI (www.tovima.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.ml
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

I was wondering the other day if there is a list of LLM-isms somewhere, like "It's not X, but Y", em-dashes, overly confident statements, etc

edit: https://github.com/NousResearch/autonovel/blob/master/ANTI-SLOP.md

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately this merely existing makes it easier for AI writers to circumvent these then. Someone could just pipe that exact repo into their slop generator, and tell it to avoid using those phrases lol.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 13 points 5 months ago

    It also penalizes the actual human writers and is forcing people to write in contorted fashion just so somebody doesn't scream that it looks like AI text. The whole focus here is fundamentally wrong. What people should be asking is whether the text is engaging, whether it's factual, and whether they found it interesting. It doesn't matter if slop is produced by a human or AI, what matters is the quality of the content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent