Archangel1313 comments on NATO is Effectively Dead After Israel Attacks Member States, Turkey and Italy

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (7 children)

They weren't "prisoners of war"...the war was already over when they were "recruited" at gun-point. They were also civilians, which makes it impossible to call them POW's unless you are also willing to admit that Russia committed war crimes just by capturing them..

And even if they were active combatants...once the war is over, you're supposed to let them go...unless they are charged with crimes committed in the act of service. Then they are expected to stand trial for those crimes, where evidence is presented to prove their guilt. That is typically reserved for high ranking officers, or political leaders.

None of that applied to Operation Osoaviakhim. What you are conveniently reframing, is called politically motivated "slave labor"...something the Soviet Union did to even their own citizens, if they refused to cooperate with the State. These people were scientists. None of them committed war crimes. If they had, then they should have stood trial with the rest of them at Nuremberg. But all this happened after those trials were over.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

But all this happened after those trials were over.

Oh. So the Soviets didn't save anyone from justice then? Glad we cleared that up. The US-Vatican collaboration protected Nazis from justice. The Soviet program did not.

They weren't "prisoners of war"...the war was already over

They were subjects of occupation. Sure, they weren't soldiers who were captured on the battlefield. They were considered part of war reparations. You're right, that's not how we use the phrase POW, but I don't have a better word for it. Politically motivated slave labor is a closer phrase. Perhaps it would more accurate Slave Labor As Reparations. Regardless of what we call it, the result was the same. They were not Nazis who were saved from justice, they were Nazis who were pressed into involuntary labor under the Soviet prison system (GULAG) as a form of reparations and then released after they had served their time. This is the opposite of what the West did when they protected thousands of Nazis.

These people were scientists. None of them committed war crimes.

Again, we finally come back to the point. The US-Vatican collaboration to protect Nazis included many many Nazis who committed war crimes.

As you have now stated about Operation Osoaviakhim: it did not target people who committed war crimes, it was done after the justice process, it was forced slave labor and not rehabilitation or masking of their public image or integration of Nazis into society.

So when Substack publishes an article about NATO dying and someone says "wait, isn't Substack profiting from Nazi shit", then I will repeat that it's appropriate since NATO was staffed with Nazis put there by Nazi collaborators and sympathizers in power in the West.

And when someone says "oh really? The people who fought the Nazis are actually Nazis" I will repeat the historical record regarding the US's Nazi rallies, their Nazi summer camps for kids, their high level collaborations between the largest companies and Third Reich, the organized ratlines, West German elections, NATO appointments, and Operation Paperclip.

And when someone says "oh yeah, well Stalin signed a treaty with the Nazis" I will repeat the history of nearly everyone in the war signing their own non-aggression pact with the Nazis and how a non-aggression pact does not equate to saving Nazis from justice.

And when someone says "well after the war the Soviets also saved Nazis from justice" I will repeat my demand for evidence and if they bring up Operation Osoaviakhim I will repeat the historical record that this happened after Nazis had been brought to justice, was a form of war reparations, was a punishment not a "saving", happened at gun point in a single day and resulted in forced labor of Nazis, and in no way attempted to rehabilitate the image, careers, political standing, or social integration of the Nazis in question.

So thanks for helping me refine my language, I appreciate it. And thanks for getting to the point where your own claims support my argument.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)

Holy crap, buddy. You are a piece of work. I'm here thinking that working with Nazis in any way, is pretty fucked up, and should never be condoned.

But then here you are like, "Fuck that! It was great! And my side even threw in some slave labor and collective punishment, too!" As if adding human rights violations to the situation is actually what justified the whole thing.

Your moral compass is utterly broken, man.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

Imagine being so morally opposed to putting Nazis to involuntary labor that you'd be willing to let your country be destroyed by the psychos that nuked 2 population centers because it would be immoral to learn rocket science.

This is what idealism does to people.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

Oh, right. Those pesky "ideals", like not kidnapping entire families and forcing them to help you build weapons. I mean, fuck those people for being born in the wrong country, amiright fascist? For someone who thinks Nazis don't deserve basic human rights...you sure sound a lot like one yourself.

And for the record...none of these places are "my country". This whole "my side", "your side" bullshit...is all you, buddy. You're all fucking degenerates, as far as I'm concerned. You justify all the same shit in the name of "my side good, your side bad".

You are no better than they are. Own it.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

As you yourself noted, they weren't kidnapped simply for being born in Germany. They were literal Nazis. They worked for the Nazi party developing weapons that would be used in the greatest war of aggression the world has seen up to that point and there weapons killed a lot of people. For someone who claims to have a moral compass, you sure do flip flop back and forth between "Soviets saved evil Nazis too" and "Soviets never should have harmed those poor innocent people".

As for using the word "degenerate", that's a hell of a choice given the context of our discussion. Maybe some of the Nazi rubbed off on you.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

Why would the Nazi rub off in me? I'm not the one defending this shit. You are. I'm just trying the one pointing out your hypocrisy.

The fact that you're actively celebrating this shit like it's some kind of victory, is what makes you a degenerate. You and the Americans are all the same.

"Well, they paid Nazis to work for them. That's disgusting! At least our side kidnapped them. Because that's so much better!"

You're both trash.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Again, go look up the word degenerate and try to understand it's relationship with the program of white supremacist eugenics.

As for celebrating that the Soviets kidnapped Nazi scientists and forced them to transfer knowledge, I don't know that I would say celebrate it. It was pretty hard on those families. And it was primarily to advance the state of the art in rockets which were primarily a weapons system. But I don't need to celebrate it. All I need to show is that my assessment was correct and that yours was incorrect, misleading, and based on your other comments either outright deceitful or exhibiting your total cognitive dissonance.

To whit - it was the Soviets that fought and repressed the Nazis. It was the Americans that saved them, integrated them, and internationalized them.

You have no refutation of this, despite attempting to argue against it - in fact your own positions support this position.

But somehow I am the problem. Because there can't be any room in your head for someone who says that Soviets were better than the allies on most fronts despite them also committing war crimes. Sorry not sorry. The reality is that the West was in the wrong, is still in the wrong, and despite all of the failings and atrocities of the USSR, they were on the right side of history.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent