you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (9 children)

    it is actively trying to destroy society,

    How so?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 4 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Those issues are something that societies and democratically elected representatives should work out; not some billionaires. The problem seems to be that some people with a good thing going don't want something that benefits them personally. They prefer no change over something that benefits everyone (but them relatively less).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    General_Effort, it's pretty clear that you are an AI evangelist, so you should know this already. But for people who are genuinely unfamiliar, they should look at the creepy words of Anthropic ally, Palantir.

    Palantir’s ‘manifesto’ has been described as an ‘AI-driven threat to humanity’s existence’ and ‘technofascism’.

    Palantir CEO Says a Surveillance State Is Preferable to China Winning the AI Race

    Leaked: Palantir’s Plan to Help ICE Deport People

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That's 1 company, not AI as a whole, and its services are obviously much in demand by our democratically elected leaders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Not only are they the company you decided to post about here, but they are the company people will often claim is the ethical one. OpenAI and X are worse.

    You can't just stick your head in the sand when you see inconvenient truths.

  • source
  • parent