this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
173 points (95.3% liked)

World News

56337 readers
2500 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's another part of it, sure, but DEFINITELY not the whole or even main reason.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mostly the main reason. That and state subsidies to kill the foreign car market with long term goals. Someone always suffers with capitalism. Even state capitalism. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mostly the main reason

Apart from not being true, that doesn't even make grammatical or mathematical sense 😄

That and state subsidies to kill the foreign car market with long term goals

Except that goes both ways, with Europe and the US subsidizing their automakers and disadvantaging the Chinese ones just as much if not even more.

Someone always suffers with capitalism.

True.

Even state capitalism

Also true, although protectionism ≠ state capitalism.

Capitalism is a philosophy/ideology where the maximum accumulation of capital possible is held up as the main goal of existence.

Protectionism DOESN'T maximize the capital of the state, or the majority of the people residing in it, only the companies benefitting from it and the politicians they bribe.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Europe and the US generally pay subsidies for EV purchases, not production.

If you buy a Chinese EV in most countries with an EV subsidy, you get two subsidies: the Chinese one for production and the local one for purchasing.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

USA did the exact same thing with Tesla.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

If I go buy a Tesla right now in Estonia, the US government isn't paying Tesla extra for building the car, despite the fact that Musk was literally president of the united states a year ago. If I buy a Mercedes, Germany won't pay the company to build the car. If I buy a BYD, the Chinese government will pay BYD.

Tesla received tax benefits and grants for building factories, but that's normal, the Chinese do that too. Nobody's complaining about that. It's the fact that they literally still pay per car built, even if the cars are sold to other countries, long after the companies are successful.

Then there's the working hours. 996 is technically illegal now, but plenty of Chinese companies still do it. There was another comment somewhere in this thread where a person said they thought Chinese factory employees have good living conditions, as he'd done the job for a few months and didn't have any issues affording things. When asked how much they had to work? 84 hours. That's worse than 996, which is "only" 72 hours.

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's kind of the point though, no?

Why aren't US or other non-chinese car makers making more electric cars to compete?

Instead they take oil money to keep combustion engines around as the primary. Despite companies like Ford having been subsidised by the government to still exist with no real requirements.

Most countries have come all the told it needed to be able to do this and refused to adapt at the same time.

I'm the end it's a race for the bottom which just sucks...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Most countries don't subsidise goods sold into other countries. It's literal economic warfare.

Most companies also have plenty of EV offerings. They're just not as popular as ICE counterparts yet.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Throwing more people at a design problem doesn't often actually improve the rate of solving it.