this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
209 points (93.0% liked)

Green Energy

4437 readers
114 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The left part is only true if the roofing has to be built explicitly for the panels. There are already covered parking lots, I can't see any downsides in just adding panels on top.

And I doubt that it requires longer cable runs than panels somewhere on a field.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for solar and wind. Put those panels everywhere possible, the more the better. I just don't get why even having this discussion.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The structure for solar panels is much heavier than for pure sunshade, as a person will have to walk on it to install and maintain the panels. You also have to deal with the associated health and safety regulations for working at height and live electricity, as well as probably pay more for insurance since there is an increased risk of fire.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why 1 purpose when 2 purpose possible?

Fuck cars, sure, but solar panels on roofing is smart.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

And for roof solar, we are not running out of space for them anytime soon. Plenty of buildings still haven't install them.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

I agree, multiple land use is the way forward. Solar panels for their own sake is seldom good enough land use, even if may be cheaper to set up.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Do you think that they build roofs that can't support people walking on them?

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I do, and I have good reason to, because I am a structural engineer and have designed them myself on occasion. A lot of these canopies over car and bike shelters are just a sheet of plexiglass.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Where are you designing these that they don’t need to support hundreds of pounds of snow or rain, or stand up to hail?

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Northern/Western Europe.

Hail bounces off, rain flows off. For a very light duty structure like a smoking shelter, bike shelter or trolley corral, they sometimes have a curved plexiglass roof that snow can just fall off or be blown off. A person is a much more intense load than snow (a person's whole weight can be on one foot). The frame might take it, but the cladding may not.

Usually they are just a product off the shelf.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My parents just bought and installed a small off the shelf carport, it has its own built-in gutter system and the ability to hold 100s of pounds on its metal roof. Nobody is covering cars with plexiglass, that would literally defeat the purpose of having shade.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Here's one for sale in Denmark, where I am, and where it snows. Polycarbonate instead of PMMA. Same thing. I wouldn't stand on it.

https://dancovershop.dk/products/carport-arizona-2-89x4-95m-palram-canopia-gra

Get an opaque sheeting if you want to keep UV off. Point stands.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 weeks ago

... that thing wouldn’t protect your car from shit where I’m from… that wouldn’t even protect your car from the sun except at like noon.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen the plexiglass ones he was talking about

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago

I’m not doubting they exist, it sure looks cool. I’m just doubting it would stand up to a couple years where I’m from, and I don’t think that you would even need to stand on that to install solar panels anyway.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which are a canopies or awnings not a roof.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fuck off lmao. A canopy is a roof.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

No it's not, if you asked to have a roof installed and someone installed a fucking canopy over your house, you'd be pissed.

This is like asking for a truck and they show up with a station wagon and tell you well it's got foldable back seats.

Words have meaning.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, when they're called "awnings."

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

Which isn't really a roof, it's just a cover.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes. It doesn't need to be 1 contiguous roof, gaps big enough to fit a ladder are ideal.

spoiler

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's more of an awning than a roof though. Plus that picture shows that this was specifically designed with the panels. As those are just straight solar panels and not roofing that's had solar installed to it.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Awnings are fabric lol. This is a roof made with solar panels, a solar roof.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And those panels are not light weight...so someone could walk on them if they wanted.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Do not walk on solar panels.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They don't build parking shade roofs to support the weight of being covered in panels, though. That has to be planned for. A typical panel that's around five and a half foot by a bit less than 3 and a half foot weighs around forty pounds. Having like two of those on your covered spot at your house would probably hold fine. But to a large parking area will add a huge amount of weight.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Shade canopies or awnings...but yea solar is heavy.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They likely won't be able to take the additional weight of the solar panels, according to code anyway.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Because we let the morons have power and now we're all paying for it