Susaga comments on Pointers explained:

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 84 points 4 months ago (11 children)

I think int*** is meant to be pointing at int**, but the image is just unclear about where everything is in perspective.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 11 child comments

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Pretty sure the image is clear:

int*** -> int*
int** -> int
Int* -> int

Clarity doesn’t mean correct. But that’s probably why it’s posted here. 🤷‍♂️

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 9 child comments

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago

int** is inside a TV, and persumably int* must be inside another TV(even though uts not edited in). The image perespective is showing one thing inside the other, inside the other. So when when int*** points the TV it reference int**, which reference int* which reference int. Its just edited very bad

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

RT*** isn't pointing at RT*, he's pointing at the TV showing RT**. The fact you think otherwise is what makes the image unclear. I'm not sure why you insist on them being wrong.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] _tasten_tiger@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago

But that doesn't hold up, because RT** isn't pointing at a TV containing RT* only RT*** is pointing at an TV containing RT** RT* and RT

permalink

fedilink

source

parent