▲ 223 ▼ Ads in New York must now label AI-generated 'synthetic performers' (techxplore.com) submitted 3 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children) Yeah, that'll work. Edit: Truth in advertising .. there's a novel concept. permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (4 children) Every ad will have a disclaimer. Like the invest in stock markets at your own risk or this thing may cause cancer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] philodendron@lemdro.id 4 points 3 months ago AI is the death of truth Disclaimer: this comment may or may not have been generated by AI permalink fedilink source parent [–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Just like every website has a cookie alert. Meaningless, annoying and extra work for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) The amount of times I got a comment for one of my personal sites that told me I’d be breaking the law, because I had no cookie banner… No! I’m not breaking the law - and if you had investigated for like 2s before notifying me about it, you’d have realized that a) it’s a static site and b) it uses no cookies So… even no cookie banners is more work for everyone involved apparently. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 months ago End even if you did use cookies, the banner is only required when you want to track people using them, purely functional cookies don't need a banner either. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Laws are stupid because people break them Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 3 months ago Not at all. A law that isn't enforceable or actually enforced is stupid. This is in my opinion a good example of a stupid law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (4 children) Every ad will have a disclaimer. Like the invest in stock markets at your own risk or this thing may cause cancer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] philodendron@lemdro.id 4 points 3 months ago AI is the death of truth Disclaimer: this comment may or may not have been generated by AI permalink fedilink source parent [–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Just like every website has a cookie alert. Meaningless, annoying and extra work for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) The amount of times I got a comment for one of my personal sites that told me I’d be breaking the law, because I had no cookie banner… No! I’m not breaking the law - and if you had investigated for like 2s before notifying me about it, you’d have realized that a) it’s a static site and b) it uses no cookies So… even no cookie banners is more work for everyone involved apparently. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 months ago End even if you did use cookies, the banner is only required when you want to track people using them, purely functional cookies don't need a banner either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] philodendron@lemdro.id 4 points 3 months ago AI is the death of truth Disclaimer: this comment may or may not have been generated by AI permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Just like every website has a cookie alert. Meaningless, annoying and extra work for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) The amount of times I got a comment for one of my personal sites that told me I’d be breaking the law, because I had no cookie banner… No! I’m not breaking the law - and if you had investigated for like 2s before notifying me about it, you’d have realized that a) it’s a static site and b) it uses no cookies So… even no cookie banners is more work for everyone involved apparently. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 months ago End even if you did use cookies, the banner is only required when you want to track people using them, purely functional cookies don't need a banner either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) The amount of times I got a comment for one of my personal sites that told me I’d be breaking the law, because I had no cookie banner… No! I’m not breaking the law - and if you had investigated for like 2s before notifying me about it, you’d have realized that a) it’s a static site and b) it uses no cookies So… even no cookie banners is more work for everyone involved apparently. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 months ago End even if you did use cookies, the banner is only required when you want to track people using them, purely functional cookies don't need a banner either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 months ago End even if you did use cookies, the banner is only required when you want to track people using them, purely functional cookies don't need a banner either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Laws are stupid because people break them Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 3 months ago Not at all. A law that isn't enforceable or actually enforced is stupid. This is in my opinion a good example of a stupid law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 3 months ago Not at all. A law that isn't enforceable or actually enforced is stupid. This is in my opinion a good example of a stupid law. permalink fedilink source parent