Nah. The audience score is vulnerable to being manipulated by both bots, coordinated hate campaigns and diehard fans that loose objectivity. I understand why some people will prefer a general population consensus but I always put more weight with the well written columnists over the flippant audience reviews.

Edit: exactly what I'm talking about lol

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rotten Tomatoes having both scores is exactly why it's more reliable than IMDB.

I usually pay most attention to the critics score. If there is a massive disparity between the critics score and the audience score, it might be sus.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Rotten Tomatoes having both scores is exactly why it's more reliable than IMDB.

IMDb also has both.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lose* 🙇🏽‍♂️

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ty! Without your correction my comment would loose all mean, I write fast and lose. Their needs to be standards for those who choose too post.