you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 4 months ago (38 children)

It's never oppression when tankies do it.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    No, you just paint of red and its better. Faster, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (19 children)

    Perhaps try that again? Add some coherency this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    The color red (like painting flames on a car) makes things go faster. It’s considered a fast, sporty color.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    The color red (like painting flames on a car) makes things go faster.

    Is this like some first-world trope or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, it’s a joke you see in cartoons. Also, communists use the color red, so it covers both American tropes and communist symbolism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, it’s a joke you see in cartoons.

    Never seen it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (11 children)

    Anything you in particular fail to understand immediately must be incoherent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Feel free to read your post again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (9 children)

    I did. I thought it was fine, butvif you don't understand, clearly it requires more explanation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    No, go ahead. Be my guest. Explain whatever the fuck...

    No, you just paint of red and its better. Faster, too.

    ...this is supposed to mean?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (7 children)

    Oh. I didn't say it would be coming from me. I'm the original source of problem asking me to fix it then expecting a better result might not be a good decision. We should make good decisions where possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I’m the original source of problem

    Agreed. YOU are the source of the problem. So YOU can go ahead and fix it.

    Okay? So again... be my guest. Explain whatever the fuck…

    No, you just paint of red and its better. Faster, too.

    …this is supposed to mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    You don't even understand my explanation of why I'm not the best person to explain it, and you want even more explanations from me!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Again - YOU are the source of the problem. So YOU can go ahead and fix it.

    Okay? So again... be my guest. Explain whatever the fuck…

    No, you just paint of red and its better. Faster, too.

    …this is supposed to mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    First tell me what you plan to get out of this explanation, because its not clarity. If it were clarity you'd go to a third party. I don't know that I can provide you clarity, I expect I can't. But maybe I can provide you with whatever it is you're lookong for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    But maybe I can provide you with whatever it is you’re lookong for.

    Fine. Just admit that you are incoherent. I'll settle for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (16 children)

    @therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com funny thing is, the tiananmen massacre was against unions and students and people revolting against the capitalist reforms that the government was trying to do (and did).

    Anyway, the imperial enemy of my imperial enemy can be my other enemy too, let's stop this binarist nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    say what you will about Leon Trotsky, but the man knew what he was about when it came to the approach of the third camp rebellion. none of us can be free of our imperial overlords if all we do is switch from one capitalist structure to another with a different coat of paint. socialism without international solidarity for the working class isn't socialism at all. it's just politics as sports with a new coat of paint

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    That totally ignores what the goals of the USSR were: ending capitalism while being a transition to communism. This is literally "don't let perfection be the enemy of the good situation." Capitalisms power needs to be crushed before any extreme leftward movement can happen, otherwise you just get color revolutions and CIA-ops forever. It seems like you believe that the "international solidarity" that the USSR was building was imperialism, and if that's the case, how would international solidarity look different as it slowly spread across the globe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    the goals of the USSR were: ending capitalism

    Is that what their goals were? Really?

    They sure had a strange way of showing it... you know, crushing anything that was too socialist and radical for their reactionary tastes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    You got a source on these claims? Who was "too socialist" and by that do you mean adventurism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    You got a source on these claims?

    The Kronstadt rebellion is a "claim" now, is it? What about the mass-murder campaign the Bolsheviks used to repress the Makhnovists in Ukraine? Is that now a "claim," too?

    Last time I checked none of these were "claims" - they were, and still are, merely recorded history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    Claims are statements without proof, and this was a list of claims without any historical reference. Kronstadt rebellion did happen, and the Makhnovists did exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    So historical record only qualifies as proof when they align with your ML vibes?

    Is that it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I am making no critiques of the USSR in this statement. I am critiquing an approach I see leftists take with modern colonial-imperialist regimes that aren't the United States today. If I want to overthrow the imperial powers of today, I have to do so by helping the people resisting their oppressors where ever they are, even if their oppressors oppose my oppressors. The people can only ever free themselves, they can never be freed by an external force. If I am going to call myself anti-imperial, I am going to act and speak in support of people resisting oppression be that a genocide in Latin America, Sudan, the Congo, or Palestine.

  • source
  • parent