you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The point is you won't have them. Nor anyone who would use them to defend your interests. Unless, of course, you're the only billionaire lurking here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    If I'm someone living in Ukraine, I may not personally have military drones but they are working to my advantage. Am I concerned about elites controlling violent tools that average people don't have access to? Yes. Would I take that over an immediate threat of dying in the trenches? Yes. I don't think it's hard to understand Ukraine's line of thought here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You don't need autonomous kill decisions for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Russia is regularly jamming drones in terminal flight. The drones are now able to stay locked onto a target and guide themselves in. This almost completely negates the effectiveness of jamming.

    These drones are critical to stopping the invader.

    If you are upset about it, point your finger at the invader for putting an entire peoples back to the wall while murdering their children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Now you are moving the goal posts. Being able to stay locked onto a target has nothing to do with autonomous kill decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    It's often both/either. Some have an operator select the target seconds before and it goes in for the final descent automatically. Others have the operator select a list of targets and a geofence at launch. Yet others are automated turrets with a 'shoot in that direction' directive. They are pretty varied.

  • source
  • parent