this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
147 points (98.7% liked)

World News

46521 readers
2098 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said a proposal to ban children under the age of 16 from social media will be part of the government’s work program, increasing its chances of becoming law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arankays@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we should instead punish the platforms who create addictive feeds and punish the users who spread Nazi content? Just an idea.

Of course, these politicians are in bed with the corporations so that'll never happen

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why instead, we can do two things

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Because issuing a prohibition is basically always a punishment of the people to distract from who is actually causing the problem.

From a political standpoint it very much is either/or, this is done to exhaust any momentum towards systemic change.

"Ban the children to protect them" is an extremely shortsighted way to approach any policy or social ill. Kids will find a way to access social media, and this ban means they'll need to do it in secret. So now anybody preying on them through those means has their implicit cooperation in covering up the abuse. That includes the media platforms themselves.

Also, why would you need to ban children from social media if the addictive strategies were under control?

A ban like this is only going to cause harm.